工作状态下自立式平臂塔吊动力特性现场实测及影响因素分析

Field test and analysis of influence factors on the dynamic characteristics of self‑supporting flat arm tower crane under multiple working conditions

  • 摘要: 为获得更为准确、精细化的平臂塔吊动力特性,考虑不同起吊位置、离地高度(吊绳长度)和吊重参数影响,开展了多工况典型自立式平臂塔吊动力特性现场实测。结果表明:臂架轴向和竖直方向振动具有较好的同步性,垂直臂架水平方向与轴向、竖直方向响应间相关性整体水平较低。采用半功率带宽法和SSI‑COV方法识别出来的结构固有频率基本一致,随着起吊位置、吊绳长度和吊重的不同,塔吊固有频率值会较空载时发生左右波动;两种方法阻尼比识别结果差异较明显,多数工况下,SSI‑COV方法识别出来的阻尼比要小于半功率带宽法识别结果。基于正交试验分析,可知上述三种影响因素(参数)对塔吊振动固有频率、阻尼比的影响均不显著,不存在主效应。开展了塔吊有限元模型优化,修正后的塔吊模型频率与实测结果能够较好地吻合。拟合了空载工况下的臂架振型函数,空载时,臂架振幅沿臂长分布基本呈线性,当吊重位于臂架端部或根部时,振幅分布则表现出明显的非线性特征。

     

    Abstract: In order to obtain more accurate and refined dynamic characteristics of the flat boom tower crane, the field test of the dynamic response of the typical freestanding flat boom tower crane was carried out considering the influence of lifting positions, lifting heights (rope lengths) and lifting weights. The test results show that the vibration along the boom axial direction and vertical direction has good synchronization. However, the response correlation between the horizontal direction of the vertical boom and the axial and vertical direction of the tower crane boom is relatively low. The natural frequencies identified by the half-power bandwidth method and the SSI-COV method are basically the same, with the difference of lifting positions, rope lengths and lifting weights, the natural frequencies of flat boom tower crane will fluctuate around the natural frequency under no load. There are some differences in the identification results of the damping ratio between the two methods, in most working conditions, the damping ratio identified by the SSI-COV method is smaller than that identified by the half power bandwidth method. Based on orthogonal test analysis, the influence of the above factors on the natural frequency and damping ratio of the tower crane is not significant, and there is no main effect. In addition, the finite element model of the flat arm tower crane is optimized, and the frequency of the updated model is in good agreement with the test results. The boom vibration mode function under no‑load condition was fitted, the amplitude distribution along the boom length exhibits an approximately linear, however, when the lifting weight appears at the end or root of the boom, the boom vibration mode may show an obvious nonliner characteristics.

     

/

返回文章
返回