不同支座布置形式下凹岛型变墩高曲线桥抗震性能对比

Comparison of seismic performance of concave island type variable pier high curve bridges with different support arrangements

  • 摘要: 小半径曲线桥在城市立交匝道桥与山区桥梁中的应用越来越普遍,得益于其美观的造型设计以及出色的复杂地形适应性。其中,凹岛型变墩高曲线桥因其能够适应高低起伏的地形而在山区大量运用。然而,历次地震灾害表明,其非规则的空间结构特征使其在地震作用下的力学特征异常复杂,震害较为严重。本文以一座凹岛型变墩高曲线箱梁桥为研究背景,基于SAP2000有限元软件,建立凹岛型变墩高曲线桥非线性分析模型,利用振动台试验数据对有限元模型进行修正优化,研究不同支座布置形式对其抗震性能影响。分析表明,合理的支座布置方式对结构抗震性能具有关键作用。具体而言,矮墩采用单向滑动支座能够减小地震作用下的位移和内力响应;高墩采用墩梁固结形式相较于固定支座能更有效地控制主梁整体移位,降低损伤风险。此外,中墩支座布置对结构受力影响显著,固定支座相较于径向滑动支座能更有效地约束中墩水平位移,合理分配结构内力,从而提升抗震能力。最终研究表明,高墩采用墩梁固结,中墩采用固定支座,矮墩采用径向约束、切向无约束的单向滑动支座的布置形式可有效改善凹岛型变墩高曲线桥的受力性能。

     

    Abstract: The application of small radius curved bridges in urban interchange ramp bridges and mountainous bridges is becoming increasingly common, thanks to their beautiful design and excellent adaptability to complex terrain. Among them, the concave island type variable pier height curved bridge is widely used in mountainous areas due to its ability to adapt to undulating terrain. However, previous earthquake disasters have shown that its irregular spatial structural characteristics make its mechanical characteristics exceptionally complex under earthquake action, resulting in severe damage. This article takes a concave island type variable pier height curved box girder bridge as the research background. Based on SAP2000 finite element software, a nonlinear analysis model of the concave island type variable pier height curved bridge is established. The finite element model is modified and optimized using vibration table test data to study the influence of different support arrangements on its seismic performance. Research has found that a reasonable arrangement of supports is crucial for the seismic performance of structures. The use of unidirectional sliding bearings for low piers can reduce displacement and internal force response under earthquake action, while the use of pier beam consolidation for high piers can more effectively control the overall displacement of the main beam and reduce the risk of damage compared to fixed bearings. Further analysis shows that the arrangement of middle pier supports has a significant impact on the structural stress. Fixed supports can better constrain the horizontal displacement of the middle pier compared to radial sliding supports, allocate internal forces reasonably, and improve seismic resistance. The results show that the arrangement of high piers with pier beam consolidation, middle piers with fixed bearings, and low piers with radial and tangential unconstrained unidirectional sliding bearings can effectively improve the stress performance of concave island shaped variable pier high curve bridges.

     

/

返回文章
返回