自复位摇摆桥墩耐震时程分析与抗震性能评估

Seismic performance analysis of self-centering rocking bridge piers based on the endurance time method

  • 摘要: 预应力自复位桥墩通过无粘结预应力(PT)筋提供自复位能力,结合耗能(ED)筋实现“旗帜型”滞回响应,并通过墩底摇摆界面释放转动约束,兼具高耗能与自复位特性,显著降低强震下残余位移。为评估其抗震性能及关键参数影响规律,本文基于耐震时程法(ETM)开展系统性验证与参数化分析。构建并验证了能准确表征摇摆行为的摇摆墩精细化有限元模型,分析初始PT力、ED筋配筋率及接触面刚度等参数在特定地震危险水平下对响应的影响;合成典型耐震时程曲线,开展ETM数值分析;对不同危险水平下设计参数的影响进行对比评估,并验证ETM的适用性。结果表明:ETM可有效评估不同设计参数对摇摆桥墩抗震性能的影响。初始PT力增大可显著抑制墩底抬升并减小位移响应,但过高的PT力会增大墩身轴压和剪力;适度增加ED筋用量有助于控制位移,但过大ED配筋则会减小其应变及耗能能力;柔性接触面材料虽减小了墩身剪力,但同时会增大质心位移,而随着接触刚度增大,墩身剪力与预应力也会增大,直至达到一定刚度阈值后趋于稳定。研究成果为自复位桥墩的抗震设计与性能快速评估提供了一种高效的简化分析方法。

     

    Abstract: Posttensioning self-centering rocking bridge piers utilize unbonded posttensioning (PT) tendons to provide self-centering capacity, while energy dissipation (ED) bars enable flag-shaped hysteresis behavior. The rocking interface at the pier base releases rotational constraints, achieving both high ED and self-centering characteristics, thereby effectively reducing residual displacements under strong seismic excitations. To evaluate their seismic performance and the influence of key design parameters, this study conducts a systematic validation and parametric analysis based on the endurance time method (ETM). A refined finite element model capable of accurately capturing the rocking behavior was developed and validated. The effects of initial PT force, ED reinforcement ratio, and contact interface stiffness on pier response under a specific seismic hazard level were examined. Representative ETM ground motion records were synthesized, and numerical simulations were carried out. The influence of design parameters under different seismic hazard levels was comparatively assessed, and the applicability of ETM in predicting the seismic response of self-centering rocking piers was verified. Results indicate that ETM is effective in evaluating the seismic performance of self-centering rocking piers with varying design parameters. Increasing initial PT force significantly suppresses base uplift and reduces displacement response, although excessive PT force may increase axial and shear forces in the pier. A moderate increase in ED amount controls displacement, but excessive ED amount can reduce strain response and ED capacity. While flexible contact materials reduce shear force in the pier body, they increase the displacement of the mass center. As interface stiffness increases, both shear force and PT force also increase, eventually stabilizing beyond a certain stiffness threshold. The findings provide an efficient and simplified analytical approach for seismic design and rapid performance assessment of self-centering rocking piers.

     

/

返回文章
返回