简化涡视角下H型断面颤振气动力非线性演化机制

Nonlinear aerodynamic evolution mechanisms in H-shaped cross-section flutter from a simplified vortex perspective

  • 摘要: 针对宽高比为5:1的H型主梁断面(旧塔科马大桥简化主梁断面),采用CFD数值模拟方法,研究其在超大振幅下的气动力非线性特性,涉及高次谐波现象及颤振导数幅值依赖性。结合SPOD(Spectral Proper Orthogonal Decomposition,谱本征正交分解)方法与壁面颤振导数,揭示了颤振导数幅值依赖性的物理机制;结合气动力时空功率谱阐明高次谐波的产生机制。进一步采用TWMD(Travelling Wave Mode Decomposition,行波模态分解)方法对断面表面时空压力进行解构,从简化涡与能量视角,对旧塔科马大桥颤振风毁过程机理进行了再探讨。研究表明:随着振幅增大,自激力中3次、5次高次谐波成分显著增强。颤振导数 A_2^* 在低折减风速(3~4)下由负转正,其值及曲线斜率随振幅增大而减小。 A_3^* 在振幅为3°和9°时,随折减风速增大先增后减,振幅大于9°时,随折减风速增大单调增加。在U/fB=4(颤振起振点),气动力以行波模式主导,基频涡伴随波浪式压力分布传播(波长≈断面宽),n次谐波主导波长约为基频波长的1/n,各行波传播速度一致,约为0.268倍来流风速;在U/fB=8(颤振坍塌点),气动力以迟滞模式主导,流场呈现缓动大尺度相干结构,压力分布线性化。旧塔科马大桥颤振过程可分为两个阶段:起振阶段由旋涡激励主导,行波分量占比显著,壁面颤振导数a2在断面前部区域为负,其余区域为正,对应 A_2^* 为负值,气动力做负功;坍塌阶段则转变为与断面运动整体滞后的迟滞分量主导,壁面颤振导数a2在断面前半部分为正,后半部分为负,对应 A_2^* 为正值,气动力做正功。过渡阶段介于二者之间,表现为行波与迟滞分量迟滞环转向相反。旋涡激励作用下的行波分量和具有显著自激性质的迟滞分量在风毁过程显著演变。

     

    Abstract: This study numerically investigates the nonlinear aerodynamic behavior of an H-shaped cross-section (with a width-to-depth ratio of 5:1) under large-amplitude vibration, representative of the old Tacoma Narrows Bridge deck. Using CFD simulations, the amplitude-dependent characteristics of flutter derivatives and higher-harmonic responses are analyzed. The physical mechanism behind the amplitude dependence of flutter derivatives is interpreted through Spectral Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (SPOD) in conjunction with surface pressure-derived flutter derivatives. Furthermore, the emergence of high-order harmonics is explained via spatiotemporal power spectral analysis. By applying Travelling Wave Mode Decomposition (TWMD), the aerodynamic forces are decomposed into coherent components, enabling a reinterpretation of the Tacoma Bridge collapse from both vortical and energy-based perspectives. Key findings indicate that the 3rd and 5th harmonic components grow significantly with vibration amplitude. The flutter derivative A_2^* shifts from negative to positive in the reduced wind speed range of 3–4, with its magnitude and slope decreasing as amplitude increases. A_3^* shows an initial increase followed by a decrease at moderate amplitudes (3° and 9°), while exhibiting monotonic increase at larger amplitudes. At U/fB = 4 (flutter initiation), the flow is dominated by travelling waves featuring a base-frequency vortex and harmonic pressure waves propagating at a constant speed of approximately 0.268U. The n-th harmonic wavelength scales as 1/n of the fundamental mode. In contrast, at U/fB = 8 (collapse point), the aerodynamic response is characterized by a hysteresis mode with large-scale flow separation and linearized pressure distribution. The failure process is delineated into two distinct stages: an initial vortex-induced vibration stage dominated by travelling waves, where the surface flutter derivative a2 is negative near the leading edge—consistent with negative A_2^* and energy dissipation—and a final flutter-driven collapse stage governed by hysteresis effects, featuring positive a2 over the front half and negative behind, resulting in positive aerodynamic work. A transitional regime exhibits competing mechanisms with reversed hysteresis loops. The evolution of both travelling-wave and hysteresis components plays a critical role throughout the failure process.

     

/

返回文章
返回